Artificial intelligence and its impact on corporate social responsibility

Authors

  • Caren Yuliet Pardo Vásquez Corporación Unificada Nacional de Educación Superior – CUN, Colombia Author
  • Giovanni Gómez Rodríguez Corporación Unificada Nacional de Educación Superior – CUN, Colombia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/pa202532

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, social responsibility, organizations, impact, threats, innovation, social changes

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has been a technology that is constantly innovating interaction, consumption and expression in society itself. It is essential to examine the interaction and link between corporate social responsibility and artificial intelligence. To analyze the impact of artificial intelligence on corporate social responsibility commitments and evaluate how these impacts are perceived by organizations, identifying possible benefits and threats. An exhaustive literature review was conducted on artificial intelligence and its influence on corporate social responsibility. This review allowed identifying the possible positive and negative aspects that organizations present when adapting to different social changes. It is necessary to evaluate the link between corporate social responsibility and human capital, since both areas are crucial and complement each other in an organization. It highlights an innovative approach to strategies that identifies the contributions of CSR to different aspects of human talent, both internal and external, and analyzes its influence on personnel performance, a critical factor in organizational decision-making

References

1. Puntoni S, Reczek R, Giesler M, Botti S. Consumers and Artificial Intelligence: An Experiential Perspective. Journal of Marketing. 2020;85:131-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920953847

2. Thamik H, Wu J. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Sustainable Development in Electronic Markets. Sustainability. 2022;14(6):3568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063568

3. Krkač K. Corporate social irresponsibility: humans vs artificial intelligence. Social Responsibility Journal. 2019;15(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2018-0219

4. Govindan K. Theory Building Through Corporate Social Responsibility 4.0 for Achieving SDGs: A Practical Step Toward Integration of Digitalization With Practice-Based View and Social Good Theory. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2022;PP:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3155247

5. Muñoz Bonilla HA, Menassa Garrido IS, Rojas Coronado L, Espinosa Rodríguez MA. La innovación en el sector servicios y su relación compleja con la supervivencia empresarial. Región Científica. 2024;3(1):2024214. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024214

6. Li G, Li N, Sethi S. Does CSR Reduce Idiosyncratic Risk? Roles of Operational Efficiency and AI Innovation. Production and Operations Management. 2020;30:2027-2045. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13483

7. Huang J, Xie P, Zeng Y, Li Y. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Technology Innovation of High-Growth Business Organizations. Sustainability. 2021;13(13):7286. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137286

8. Zapata Muriel FA, Montoya Zapata S, Montoya-Zapata D. Dilemas éticos planteados por el auge de la inteligencia artificial: una mirada desde el transhumanismo. Región Científica. 2024;3(1):2024225. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024225

9. Hernández-Lugo M. Artificial Intelligence as a tool for analysis in Social Sciences: methods and applications. LatIA. 2024;2(11). https://doi.org/10.62486/latia202411

10. Pérez Gamboa AJ, Díaz-Guerra DD. Artificial Intelligence for the development of qualitative studies. LatIA. 2023;1(4). https://doi.org/10.62486/latia20234

11. Pagano T, Loureiro R, Lisboa F, Peixoto R, Guimarães G, Cruz G, Araujo M, Santos L, Cruz M, Oliveira E, Winkler I, Nascimento E. Bias and Unfairness in Machine Learning Models: A Systematic Review on Datasets, Tools, Fairness Metrics, and Identification and Mitigation Methods. Big Data Cognitive Computing. 2023;7:15. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7010015

12. Sánchez-Castillo V, Gómez-Cano CA, Pérez-Gamboa AJ. La Economía Azul en el contexto de los objetivos del desarrollo sostenible: una revisión mixta e integrada de la literatura en la base de datos Scopus. AiBi Revista De Investigación, Administración E Ingeniería. 2024;12(2):206-21. https://doi.org/10.15649/2346030X.4028

13. Cheng L, Varshney K, Liu H. Socially Responsible AI Algorithms: Issues, Purposes, and Challenges. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 2021;71:1137-1181. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.12814

14. Mogrovejo Andrade JM. Estrategias resilientes y mecanismos de las organizaciones para mitigar los efectos ocasionados por la pandemia a nivel internacional. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):202211. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202211

15. Sánchez Castillo V, Pérez Gamboa AJ, Gómez Cano CA. Trends and evolution of Scientometric and Bibliometric research in the SCOPUS database. Bibliotecas Anales de investigación. 2024;20(1). http://revistas.bnjm.sld.cu/index.php/BAI/article/view/834

16. Eslava-Zapata R, Gómez-Cano C, Chacón-Guerrero E, Esteban-Montilla R. Análisis Bibliométrico sobre estilos de liderazgo: contribuciones y tendencia de la investigación. Educación y Sociedad. 2023;15(6):574-87. https://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/rus/article/view/4175

17. Page M, Moher D, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff J, Akl E, Brennan S, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw J, Hrõbjartsson A, Lalu M, Li T, Loder E, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness L, Stewart L, Thomas J, Tricco A, Welch V, Whiting P, McKenzie J. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ. 2020;372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160

18. Kammerer-David MI, Murgas-Téllez B. La innovación tecnológica desde un enfoque de dinámica de sistemas. Región Científica. 2024;3(1):2024217. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024217

19. Mansour M, Aman N, Al‐Ghazali B, Shah S. Perceived corporate social responsibility, ethical leadership, and moral reflectiveness impact on pro-environmental behavior among employees of small and medium enterprises: A double-mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967859

20. Vrontis D, Christofi M, Pereira V, Tarba S, Makrides A, Trichina E. Artificial intelligence, robotics, advanced technologies and human resource management: a systematic review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2021;33:1237-1266. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1871398

21. Braganza A, Chen W, Canhoto A, Sap S. Productive employment and decent work: The impact of AI adoption on psychological contracts, job engagement and employee trust. Journal of Business Research. 2020;131:485-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.018

22. Moreira AdJ, Reis Fonseca RM. La inserción de los movimientos sociales en la protección del medio ambiente: cuerpos y aprendizajes en el Recôncavo da Bahia. Región Científica. 2024;3(1):2024208. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024208

23. Sánchez-Castillo V, Gómez-Cano C, Alape-Chaguala R. Dynamics of institutional rural social networks and their contribution to social capital in a collective of THEOBROMA CACAO L. PRODUCERS. FACE: Revista De La Facultad De Ciencias Económicas Y Empresariales. 2023;23(1). https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v23i1.2475

24. Potočan, V. Technology and Corporate Social Responsibility. Sustainability. 2021;13(15):8658. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158658

25. Kong, D., Liu, B. Digital Technology and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 2023;59:2967-2993. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2023.2199122

26. Sánchez-Castillo V, García-Rojas R, Gómez-Cano C. Redes Sociales Rurales y Capital social: El caso de los paneleros de Bellavista. Universidad y Sociedad. 2023;14(5):383-93. https://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/rus/article/view/3991

27. Li, J., Hai, Q. Evaluation of Economic Security and Environmental Protection Benefits from the Perspective of Sustainable Development and Technological Ecological Environment. Sustainability. 2023;15(7):6072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076072

28. Velásquez Castro LA, Paredes-Águila JA. Revisión sistemática sobre los desafíos que enfrenta el desarrollo e integración de las tecnologías digitales en el contexto escolar chileno, desde la docencia. Región Científica. 2024;3(1):2024226. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024226

29. Onitsuka, K., Hidayat, A., Huang, W. Challenges for the next level of digital divide in rural Indonesian communities. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries. 2018;84. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12021

30. Wang, D., Zhou, T., Wang, M. Information and communication technology (ICT), digital divide and urbanization: Evidence from Chinese cities. Technology in Society. 2021;64:101516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101516

31. Vázquez-Vidal V, Martínez-Prats G. El desarrollo regional y su impacto en la sociedad mexicana. Región Científica. 2023;2(1):202336. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202336

32. Sidhoum, A., Serra, T. Corporate Sustainable Development. Revisiting the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Dimensions. Sustainable Development. 2018;26:365-378. https://doi.org/10.1002/SD.1711

33. Saveliev, A., Zhurenkov, D. Artificial intelligence and social responsibility: the case of the artificial intelligence strategies in the United States, Russia, and China. Kybernetes. 2020;50:656-675. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-01-2020-0060

34. Yuan, Y., Lu, L., Tian, G., Yu, Y. Business Strategy and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. 2018;162:359-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-018-3952-9

35. Lepri, B., Oliver, N., Pentland, A. Ethical machines: The human-centric use of artificial intelligence. iScience. 2021;24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102249

36. Meurisch, C., Mühlhäuser, M. Data Protection in AI Services. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR). 2021;54:1-38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3440754

37. Bottomley, D., Thaldar, D. Liability for harm caused by AI in healthcare: an overview of the core legal concepts. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2023;14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1297353

38. Hacker, P. The European AI Liability Directives - Critique of a Half-Hearted Approach and Lessons for the Future. ArXiv. 2022;abs/2211.13960. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.13960

39. Sætra, H. A Framework for Evaluating and Disclosing the ESG Related Impacts of AI with the SDGs. Sustainability. 2021;13(15):8503. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158503

40. Du S, Xie C. Paradoxes of artificial intelligence in consumer markets: Ethical challenges and opportunities. Journal of Business Research. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.024

41. Arpaci I. A Multianalytical SEM-ANN Approach to Investigate the Social Sustainability of AI Chatbots Based on Cybersecurity and Protection Motivation Theory. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2024;71:1714-1725. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3339578

42. Gómez Miranda OM. La franquicia: de la inversión al emprendimiento. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):20229. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc20229

43. McBride R, Dastan A, Mehrabinia P. How AI affects the future relationship between corporate governance and financial markets: a note on impact capitalism. Managerial Finance. 2022;48(8). https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-12-2021-0586

44. Birkstedt T, Minkkinen M, Tandon A, Mäntymäki M. AI governance: themes, knowledge gaps and future agendas. Internet Research. 2023;33(7). https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-01-2022-0042

45. Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2019;1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/S42256-019-0088-2

46. Hu Y, Liu Q. Local Digital Economy and Corporate Social Responsibility. Sustainability. 2023;15(11):8487. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118487

47. Sanabria Martínez MJ. Construir nuevos espacios sostenibles respetando la diversidad cultural desde el nivel local. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):20222. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc20222

48. Chetty K, Qigui L, Gcora N, Josie J, Li W, Fang C. Bridging the digital divide: measuring digital literacy. Economics. 2018;12. https://doi.org/10.5018/ECONOMICS-EJOURNAL.JA.2018-23

49. Fisk R, Gallan A, Joubert A, Beekhuyzen J, Cheung L, Russell–Bennett R. Healing the Digital Divide With Digital Inclusion: Enabling Human Capabilities. Journal of Service Research. 2022;26:542-559. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705221140148

50. Ricardo Jiménez LS. Dimensiones de emprendimiento: Relación educativa. El caso del programa cumbre. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):202210. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202210

51. Chang Y, Ke J. Socially Responsible Artificial Intelligence Empowered People Analytics: A Novel Framework Towards Sustainability. Human Resource Development Review. 2023;23(1):88-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843231200930.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Pardo Vásquez CY, Gómez Rodríguez G. Artificial intelligence and its impact on corporate social responsibility. Southern perspective / Perspectiva austral [Internet]. 2025 Jan. 1 [cited 2025 Jul. 7];3:32. Available from: https://pa.ageditor.ar/index.php/pa/article/view/32