Culture as a constitutive dimension of social life: theoretical proposals of Raymond Williams and Clifford Geertz. Convergences and divergences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/pa202457Keywords:
Geertz, Williams, Symbolic Culture, Interpretation, Cultural MaterialismAbstract
Clifford Geertz, in his seminal work “The Interpretation of Cultures” (1973), proposes that culture should be understood as a system of symbolic meanings that are interpreted rather than seeking laws through experimentation. Geertz stresses that culture is a web of meanings and that anthropology should focus on the interpretation of these symbolic meanings. His semiotic perspective holds that culture is a text that people read and create to make sense of their experiences. On the other hand, Raymond Williams criticizes the base-superstructure model, arguing that culture is an active meaning-making process that permeates all social actions. Williams argues that cultural practices are both social and material and that the economy is intrinsically linked to culture. Both authors agree that culture is fundamental to understanding social actions and history. Geertz focuses on symbolic interpretation, while Williams stresses the relationship between culture and economics, proposing a view of cultural materialism that incorporates cultural production as an essential part of social life. Culture, according to Williams, must be seen as an integral process that includes conflict and change, and not simply as isolated products of society. In abstract, the work of Geertz and Williams provides a profound understanding of culture as a web of symbolic meanings that must be interpreted in order to understand social dynamics and historical processes
References
1. Austin, T. (2010). Conceptos fundamentales para el estudio de la interculturalidad, en Serie Cuadernos de Discusión y Estudios 2 de la Dirección de Investigaciones de la Universidad de Temuco.
2. Carrera, J. E. (2022). Imaginarios sociales y antropología: convergencias teórico-epistemológicas para una perspectiva profunda de la realidad social. Imagonautas 16 (3), pp. 36-52.
3. Geertz, C. (1992). La interpretación de las culturas. Barcelona, España: Gedisa Editorial.
4. Gordillo, G. (2006). En el Gran Chaco: Antropologías e historias. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
5. Gordillo, G. (2010). Deseando Otro Lugar: Reterritorilizaciones guaraníes. En G. Gordillo y S. Hirsch (Eds.), Movilizaciones indígenas e identidades en disputa en la Argentina (pp. 207-236). Buenos Aires: Flacso-La Crujía.
6. Gordillo, G. (2018). Los escombros del progreso. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
7. Gordillo, G. y Hirsch, S. (2010). La presencia ausente: políticas estatales, invisibilizaciones y emergencias indígenas en la Argentina. En G. Gordillo y S. Hirsch (Eds.), Movilizaciones indígenas e identidades en disputa en la Argentina (pp. 15-38). Buenos Aires: FLACSO-La Crujía.
8. Williams, R. (1994). Sociología de la cultura. Barcelona: Paidós.
9. Williams, R. (2000). ‘’Cultura’’, en Palabras clave. Un vocabulario de la cultura y la sociedad, Nueva Visión, Buenos Aires.
10. Williams, R. (1960). Culture and Society. Londres: Chatto and Windus.
11. Williams, R. (1985). Keywords. A vocabulary of Culture and Society. Nueva York: Oxford University Press
12. Cossu A. Clifford Geertz, intellectual autonomy, and interpretive social science. Am J Cult Sociol 2021;9:347–75. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-019-00085-8.
13. Paidipaty P. ‘Tortoises all the way down’: Geertz, cybernetics and ‘culture’ at the end of the Cold War. Anthropological Theory 2020;20:97–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499619899747.
14. del Valle Alcalá R. Utopia against Abstraction: Raymond Williams, Communication, and the Desire of the Common. Rethinking Marxism 2022;34:225–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2051379.
15. Middleton S. RAYMOND WILLIAMS’S “STRUCTURE OF FEELING” AND THE PROBLEM OF DEMOCRATIC VALUES IN BRITAIN, 1938–1961. Modern Intellectual History 2020;17:1133–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244318000537.
16. Ramos L-V, Luis E. Raymond Williams and Antonio Gramsci’s contributions to adult education 2021. https://doi.org/10.12681/aeci.28796.
17. Susen S. The Interpretation of Cultures: Geertz Is Still in Town. Sociologica – International Journal for Sociological Debate 2024;18:25–63. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18664.
18. Bourke R, Skinner Q. History in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press; 2022.
19. Vendra MCC. Paul Ricœur and Clifford Geertz: The Harmonic Dialogue between Philosophical Hermeneutics and Cultural Anthropology. Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 2020;11:49–64. https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2020.488.
20. Fassin D, Steinmetz G. The Social Sciences in the Looking Glass: Studies in the Production of Knowledge. Duke University Press; 2023.
21. Fromherz AJ, Samin N, editors. Knowledge, Authority and Change in Islamic Societies. Brill; 2021.
22. Rawls AW, Turowetz J. “Discovering culture” in interaction: solving problems in cultural sociology by recovering the interactional side of Parsons’ conception of culture. Am J Cult Sociol 2021;9:293–320. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-019-00079-6.
23. Lucio-Villegas E. Raymond Williams and Antonio Gramsci’s contributions to adult education. Adult Education Critical Issues 2021;1:23–31. https://doi.org/10.12681/aeci.28796.
24. Madigan T. 5: Cultural Syntax and the Rules of Meaning-making: A New Paradigm for the Interpretation of Culture, 2023.
25. Fuchs C. The problems of base/superstructure and ideology in the works of Stuart Hall, Georg Lukács, and Raymond Williams. The Communication Review n.d.;0:1–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2023.2242068.
26. Simonicca A. The Weberian Line of Anthropology: George Marcus from Writing Culture to Design. In: Matera V, Biscaldi A, editors. Ethnography: A Theoretically Oriented Practice, Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021, p. 341–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51720-5_15.
27. Hillebrandt F. Chapter 3 Practices – viewed from a sociological perspective. Chapter 3 Practices – viewed from a sociological perspective, De Gruyter; 2022, p. 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110743791-005.
28. Lucio-Villegas E. Raymond Williams and Antonio Gramsci’s contributions to adult education. Adult Education Critical Issues 2021;1:23–31. https://doi.org/10.12681/aeci.28796.
29. Rawls AW, Turowetz J. Garfinkel’s Politics: Collaborating with Parsons to Document Taken-for-Granted Practices for Assembling Cultural Objects and their Grounding in Implicit Social Contract. Am Soc 2021;52:131–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-021-09479-z.
30. Foks F. Constructing the Field in Interwar Social Anthropology: Power, Personae, and Paper Technology. Isis 2020;111:717–39. https://doi.org/10.1086/712138.
31. Annavarapu S, Levenson Z. The Social Life of the State: Relational Ethnography and Political Sociology. Qual Sociol 2021;44:337–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-021-09491-2.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yilena Montero Reyes (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
