Durkheim’s contributions to Cultural Studies. A look from the social sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/pa202456Keywords:
Durkheim, Social Facts, Morality, State, Social CohesionAbstract
Émile Durkheim, a leading sociologist of the French Third Republic, did not limit himself to scientific production, but was actively engaged in the political and social problems of his time. Durkheim developed a «science of morality» and of political and social institutions, emphasizing the relationship between morality, the individual and society. According to Durkheim, the individual is born of society, and not the other way around, implying that social facts coerce and determine the lives of individuals from outside. The human body, although recognized as dual (biological and social), is considered less relevant than the social facts that condition it. Durkheim argued that society imposes norms and regulates the behavior of individuals, who are born into an already established system that coerces them. For him, society is a specific reality that surpasses the sum of individuals and has an existence independent of them. This is reflected in his analysis of the division of labor, where social morality and the restrictions imposed by society are essential to avoid destructive tendencies in the individual. In addition, Durkheim emphasized the role of the state, derived from society, in maintaining national cohesion. According to him, the function of government is to protect citizens and to lead society to its proper end, always respecting freedom of thought. He criticized both the socialist theory, which subordinates the individual to the state, and the liberal theory, which considers society as an abstraction. For Durkheim, authority must be based on a rational belief in it on the part of the citizens, without which the nation would fall into chaos
References
1. Durkheim, É. (1992). Las formas elementales de la vida religiosa. Editorial Akal, Madrid, España.
2. Durkheim, É. (1992). Las reglas del método sociológico. Editorial Dedalo, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
3. Durkheim, É. (2004). La división del trabajo social. Editorial Libertador, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
4. Durkheim, E. (1967). De la división del trabajo social. Schapire, Buenos Aires. Libros 1, 2 y 3: Selección de capítulos.
5. Lacroix, B. (1984). Durkheim y lo político, FCE, México, Cap. 1.
6. Sossa, A. (2009). Cuerpo y sociología. Reflexiones sobre el cuerpo en la teoría sociológica clásica: Exploración al pensamiento de Marx, Durkheim y Weber. Revista Cultura y Religión 4.
7. Carls P. The unrecognized genius of Durkheim. Journal of Classical Sociology 2022;22:123–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X211046121.
8. Berger AA. A Cultural Studies Analysis of Everyday Life. In: Berger AA, editor. Everyday Life in the Postmodern World: An Introduction to Cultural Studies, Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022, p. 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07926-9_3.
9. Keim W. Frenchman, Jew, Positivist 2021. https://doi.org/10.3167/ds.2021.250107.
10. Fournier M. Book Review of P. Smith’s Durkheim and After. Am J Cult Sociol 2023;11:393–405. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-022-00180-3.
11. Puetz K. Relational Durkheim: Homo Duplex as the Foundation of a Formalist Cultural Sociology. Sociological Theory 2024:07352751241241517. https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751241241517.
12. Dawson M. Book review: Durkheim and After: The Durkheimian Tradition, 1893–2020. Thesis Eleven 2022;169:117–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136221089127.
13. Smith P. Émile Durkheim and charisma. Routledge International Handbook of Charisma, Routledge; 2020.
14. Joas H, Pettenkofer A. The Oxford Handbook of Émile Durkheim. Oxford University Press; 2024.
15. Wandi JI, Afnita N, Hefni H. Study of "Functional Structure" Emilie Durkheim Reviewed From Educational Anthropology on Character and Behavior Society. Ikhtisar 2021;1:39–51.
16. Belvedere C. Collective Consciousness and the Phenomenology of Émile Durkheim. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26114-5.
17. Burchardt M, Yasemin Ural N. The future of religious pasts: religion and cultural heritage-making in a secular age – introduction. Cultural Studies n.d.:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2024.2363200.
18. Mirsondosi SM, Yousofi A, Sedigh Oraee G, Asgharpour Masouleh A, Pirouzfar S. A reflection on utopian perspectives in the thought of the founders of sociology. Sociological Cultural Studies 2024.
19. Xiaoming L. Emerging from the shadows of datafication: A favourable turn for cultural studies. Learning to Live with Datafication, Routledge; 2022.
20. Capaldi D, Ragone G. Mediology And Serial Narrative, In Literature And Beyond, Cagliari; 2022.
21. Courpasson D, Younes D, Reed M. Durkheim in the Neoliberal Organization: Taking Resistance and Solidarity Seriously. Organization Theory 2021;2:2631787720982619. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720982619.
22. Wandi JI, Afnita N, Hefni H. Kajian “Struktur Fungsional” Emilie Durkheim Ditinjau dari Educational Anthropology on Character and Behavior Society. Ikhtisar: Jurnal Pengetahuan Islam 2021;1:34–50. https://doi.org/10.55062//IJPI.2021.v1i1.9.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yilena Montero Reyes (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
